Liberal Bomb Throwing

Opinions on politics, sports, and current events.


Blog For Free!


Archives
Home
2007 September
2007 August
2007 July
2007 June
2007 May
2007 April
2007 March
2007 February
2007 January
2006 December
2006 October
2006 March
2006 February
2006 January
2005 August
2005 July
2005 June
2005 May
2005 April
2005 January
2004 December
2004 November

My Links
Old Bull's Club
Oregon State Football
Gonzaga Bulldogs
Alaskan Republican Party
National Rifle Assc.
Anchorage Daily News
Cuban Cigars
Yahoo

tBlog
My Profile
Send tMail
My tFriends
My Images


Sponsored
Blog


Liberal Bomb Throwing
03.05.07 (1:13 pm)   [edit]
The Sunday edition of the Anchorage Daily News included the usual commentary by Beth Bragg. In her article she called me and others a bigot. I have been called worse, but her accusation touched a nerve. Following is a segment of her article: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Intolerance in Alaska prompts a gay couple's departure BETH BRAGG COMMENT (Published: March 4, 2007) Alaska's many bigots will be thrilled to learn they've helped chase a gay couple out of the country. They'll hear that the Anchorage men whose love story inspired a constitutional amendment legalizing discrimination in Alaska have moved to England, and they'll shout good riddance. They'll congratulate themselves for the role they played in making Jay Brause and Gene Dugan look beyond America in their pursuit of the personal freedoms held so dearly by Americans. If the bigots are lucky, the god to whom they pray will forgive them someday. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX X The article went on and on about these poor gay men who want to be legally recognized the same as married people. I must respond. This is the type of far left thinking that is constantly bombarding our lives at every level. First, the God I pray to does not approve of a gay lifestyle. Second, I’m not congratulating myself on their departure, but I certainly am not sorry to see them go. Third, I do not approve of the homosexual lifestyle. I believe it is a moral question. I also do not approve of polygamy, nor do I want the state to offer benefits to polygamists. It’s not like I’m saying I don’t approve of the color of your skin! Miss Bragg continues in her article to say the fear that gay benefits would “rock the earth off it’s axis” and that marriage should be kept sacred for people like Britney Spears. She is a colorful writer, but those statements are ludicrous. The will of Alaskans is that marriage should be strictly between one man and one woman. Furthermore, outside of that traditional union, benefits shall not be offered. Pointing to cases where traditional marriage has failed is also a poor argument. Miss Bragg, I want to be clear, homosexuality is an immoral lifestyle that I do not support. Traditional Americans do not support it either. By your writing, all traditional Americans are bigots. You even mentioned that it was only two years ago that England changed their laws to recognize gay unions. So I assume, by your reasoning, that until two years ago, the citizens of England were also bigots! You are free to rationalize immoral behavior all you like, but tossing verbal grenades at traditionalists is not good policy. You may be costing hard working Americans their livelihood, as I and others will be canceling our newspaper subscription.
 


posted by: evilmammoth (reply)
post date: 03.05.07 (1:39 pm)

We don't all pray to the same gods, nor should people be asked to alter their lifestyles or accept abridgment of their rights because you and those like you wish to reinforce your religious beliefs in public policy.

Traditionalist Americans have perverted what this country supposedly stand for. They understand less than anybody what being an American and a patriot is about. It has nothing to do with fervent nationalism or support for war. It has to do with the people and hanging up self-righteousness in favor of adopting the mentality of a free society.

And besides...morality is a purely human hallucination.



posted by: dlgbomber (reply)
post date: 03.06.07 (7:54 am)

Well, most of us pray to SOME God, even if we differ on who that should be. But I can't think of ANY religion that recognizes homosexual behavior, much less embraces it.
I never mentioned the war, you did.
I'm not trying to reinforce my beliefs in public policy, they are already policy. It's the Gays trying to change an existing policy to reinforce their beliefs.
I don't quite understand your last statement. Are you an Atheist?



posted by: PastorDave (reply)
post date: 03.06.07 (8:15 am)

Some clear, straight shooting. I believe homosexual behavior is immoral, and a detriment to our society. I think, in our great country, we can surely make room for two people to be gay and live peaceful lives. Their bedroom is a place of privacy- I'll stay out. But as you have clearly said, when gays push a political agenda upon us, seems we have every right to push back. These people want to redefine marriage, and education, and even Christianity. And they make it so that, to have a contrary point of view, is to be labeled a "bigot". I've no doubt, if possible, these same activists would outlaw any opposition to their agenda. So I say, if someone picks a fight with you, they ought to be willing to take a few punches with the same bravado with which they throw them.

Thanks.



posted by: evilmammoth (reply)
post date: 03.07.07 (11:20 am)

Reply to: dlgbomber

The point is that public policy has clearly been derived from the religious sentiments of policymakers. It is not, in fact, public policy in many cases. It is a manifestation of non-secular belief systems that should be excised from the law.

Like I said, we are talking about freedom and equality for all people. You and PastorDave make the concession that people can do whatever they want in the privacy of their bedrooms. Well, it works the same way for religion. Do whatever you want in your church or synagogue but keep it there. It has NO PLACE dictating the lives of others. A ban on gay marriage is doing just that. It is inhibiting people from enjoying full natural rights that are available to heterosexuals. Face it. It is discriminatory.

...if you want to call me an atheist, I suppose it's the closest word to the truth. I just believe that the personification of god as human is unimaginative and far too simple an interpretation to be even close to the truth. As far as who/what runs this Big Machine, I don't know. I'm fairly certain it doesn't have a son, though.

Your Name:


Your Comment:


Clan Crest Lindsay - courtesy of www.scotclans.com