|
Logos and Mascots
Opinions on politics, sports, and current events.
|
 Blog For Free!
Archives
Home
2007 September
2007 August
2007 July
2007 June
2007 May
2007 April
2007 March
2007 February
2007 January
2006 December
2006 October
2006 March
2006 February
2006 January
2005 August
2005 July
2005 June
2005 May
2005 April
2005 January
2004 December
2004 November
My Links
Old Bull's Club
Oregon State Football
Gonzaga Bulldogs
Alaskan Republican Party
National Rifle Assc.
Anchorage Daily News
Cuban Cigars
Yahoo
tBlog
My Profile
Send tMail
My tFriends
My Images
Sponsored
Blog
|
| Logos and Mascots |
| 08.05.05 (8:11 am) [edit] |
I read the following story and couldn’t resist posting it right here. I personally think the NCAA is taking unnecessary action. What is wrong with letting each college determine its own policy on mascots and logos? Next, the NCAA will be setting up some kind of compliance panel to review all team logos and mascots to ensure that nobody gets their feeling hurt.
What’s next? Is Notre Dame going to change their mascot and logos? Think about it, some people of Irish decent may be offended. Besides, as highlighted below, the “Fighting Irish” logo may be deemed “hostile”.
How about the Arizona Wildcats? Not all cats are wild, in fact, the majority of them are domesticated, calm, and reserve. Are cat owners going to rally together to force a name change at Arizona?
How about the Huskies at UofW? Are confused and overweight people tired of the University of Washington calling their teams the “Huskies”? Or the “Lady Huskies”?
Is the Stanford Cardinal a bird, or someone who answers to the Pope? Oh no, don’t get religion involved or the ACLU will step in. We have enough confusion already, we don’t want them as well.
| |